Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
-- So you resort to a completely nonsensical claim that the top of the building was spinning.

Spinning, turning, my choice of terms may have been inexact, but methinks dirtboy doth protest too much. Here's the video.

-- So you resort to a completely nonsensical claim that the top of the building was spinning.

Exact precision is not needed in this size of operation. You clearly don't want to actually refute all the evidence in his report that thermite was probably used. You are a propagandist spouting only phrases that you think people will suck up. I have no idea what your motivation is.

I leave you with a few panels from one of Prof. Jones presentations for the layman that are apropos to this conversation.



243 posted on 07/30/2006 1:38:32 PM PDT by Anthem (One can not lie their way to the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]


To: Anthem
Oh, I am SO convinced from those slides.

Not.

Your side fails Occam's razor at every step. Planes were flown into the WTC. The impact and ensuing fires made the buildings collapse. Only a lunatic fringe believes otherwise. END OF STORY.

250 posted on 07/30/2006 1:55:37 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]

To: Anthem
The design of the WTC led to the pancaking we saw.

End of story.

252 posted on 07/30/2006 1:56:47 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson