Wow, now that's what we refer to around here as a "Hanging Judge".
If he was going to do that to a dog then it's only a matter of time before it was another guys head that was going to get it, but 9 years on that assumtion only? He really must have ticked the judge off big time to get that sentance.
1 posted on
07/28/2006 10:18:16 AM PDT by
Abathar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Abathar
If he had stabbed his niece...in Massachusetts...he would have gotten 9 months.
Probation
To: Abathar
3 posted on
07/28/2006 10:19:48 AM PDT by
nuconvert
([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
To: Abathar
Too bad this judge wasn't on the Andrea Yates case.
4 posted on
07/28/2006 10:20:00 AM PDT by
dfwgator
To: Abathar
Stab Dog (Crazy) = 9 years
Drown Children (Crazy) = Not guilty.
Hmmm. Makes sense to me /sarc
P.S. I like dogs and think they guy probably deserved this -- if nothing else it keeps a crazy guy off the streets for awhile.
5 posted on
07/28/2006 10:20:08 AM PDT by
tdewey10
(It's time for the party to return to the principles of President Reagan.)
To: Abathar
Was the dogs name Sam and did Sam tell the perp to plunge in that knife?
6 posted on
07/28/2006 10:21:12 AM PDT by
Vaquero
("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
To: Abathar
Prediction: Someone will state that the judge was too lenient before this thread clicks over to post 51.
7 posted on
07/28/2006 10:21:12 AM PDT by
Michael.SF.
(The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other peoples money -- M. Thatcher)
To: Abathar
Wow, now that's what we refer to around here as a "Hanging Judge". Looks like the judge determined (by all accounts correctly) that this guy is a freakin' psychopath and wanted to keep him off the streets for as long as she could. We'll probably read about Mr. Garcia again in a few years.
9 posted on
07/28/2006 10:22:06 AM PDT by
Drew68
To: Abathar
. . . the judge ordered him removed from the courtroom for repeatedly screaming at the prosecutor. . . . There's the reason -- guy is obviously and totally out of control, and he doesn't confine his attentions to members of his own family (domestic altercations have traditionally resulted in more lenient sentences because of the emotional component). Also, even though the article doesn't mention it I bet he's got a string of prior offenses. Folks don't get like this all at once.
10 posted on
07/28/2006 10:22:30 AM PDT by
AnAmericanMother
((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
To: Abathar
Yeah, a guy can't stab a dog anymore without some uppity judge getting his panties in an uproar over it.
To: HairOfTheDog
13 posted on
07/28/2006 10:23:49 AM PDT by
CSM
("Most men's inappropriate thoughts end as soon as the girl talks..." - Dinsdale, 5/30/06)
To: Abathar
Garcia did not hear his sentence because the judge ordered him removed from the courtroom for repeatedly screaming at the prosecutor. They should've stabbed him between the eyes to shut him up.
To: Abathar
You are exactly right on both counts. 2 years might have been more appropriate, but sill glad to him off the street for awhile.
RW
19 posted on
07/28/2006 10:28:04 AM PDT by
RunningWolf
(2-1 Cav 1975)
To: Abathar; Flyer; technochick99; sinkspur; 88keys; DugwayDuke; sissyjane; Severa; RMDupree; ecurbh; ..
To: Abathar
...because he was upset by its barking. Ream pleaded with the judge to show no leniency, contending that Garcia showed no remorse. The woman aborted the baby because she was upset at the prospect of having a baby before she was ready to take care of it.
"Babies cry all the time," said the woman. "I just wasn't prepared to deal with it's whining and noise!"
The Judge showed understanding, contending that the woman does not need to show remorse over the killing of a human being before it is born.
"Children can be a problem when it comes to peace and quiet," the judge remarked.
22 posted on
07/28/2006 10:31:40 AM PDT by
Van Jenerette
(Your Republic...if you can keep it!)
To: Abathar
It's well known that German shepherds, like SUVs, can direct their human charges to perform criminal acts. Maybe this guy deserves a medal for not listening to the voices.
To: Abathar
Yep, gotta practice on dogs first.
28 posted on
07/28/2006 10:40:38 AM PDT by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: Abathar
If only that crazy Ohio judge Edward Connor would give a sentence like that to repeat child rapists. But no, Connor gives them a pass instead.
30 posted on
07/28/2006 10:43:02 AM PDT by
Dante3
To: Abathar; Indy Pendance; Still German Shepherd; dervish; Dick Vomer; Kozak; Joe 6-pack; joesnuffy; ..
GERMAN SHEPHERD PING LIST
(Please Freep-mail me if youd like to be on or off the list.)
35 posted on
07/28/2006 11:04:22 AM PDT by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
To: Abathar
It does seem a bit extreme of a sentence - actually, I'm not sure why he got jail at all. Definitely some kind of punishment, but jail?
36 posted on
07/28/2006 11:05:36 AM PDT by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
To: Abathar
Just imagine what Hugo will be like after the nine years in prison.
46 posted on
07/28/2006 11:48:25 AM PDT by
VRWCtaz
(A challenge to Liberals: I will read any book you name - if you will do the same. (very few takers))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson