[rockprof]

Your response reeks of elitism.
The author didn't use Time and Encarta to prove his case. He cited those works as evidence how the less-advanced texts on evolution oversimplify and draw conclusions based upon our current popular working theories.
Here's his list of actual works cited:

It's clear you've never written an undergraduate college-level scientific research paper. The only primary sources you cited in that list are Origin of Species by Darwin and the Science paper. The other six sources are popular books and magazine articles.

This paper was written to convince people who know nothing of science or how it works. The scientists are then "elitists" because we refuse to take your ridiculous claims seriously.

[DouglasKC]

This paper was written to convince people who know nothing of science or how it works. The scientists are then "elitists" because we refuse to take your ridiculous claims seriously.

I'm going to have to go ahead and disagree with this statement. This paper was written to give glory to God as the creator of life. It does this by illuminating a few of the major problems that the theory of evolution has.

I find it incredible that so many evolution believers are content to dismiss us believers as brain dead, confused, igorant savages who have somehow been duped. As if somehow we're just too stupid or deluded to face facts. That's why attitudes like yours are usually characterized as elitist.