Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ToryHeartland
Go back further, and you find a common ancestor for all mammals. From that ancestor evolved all the mammals we see today.

Is that a statement of fact or theory? If a statement of fact, what is the creature and when was it found?

This is when people claiming science is on there side fall down. They lose sight of when they have an operating theory and when they have a fact. Until you find this creature, you should state this as an implication of the theory, not as evidence for it.

I'm not anti-science, but if you want to play scientist, play right.

48 posted on 07/22/2006 6:40:22 AM PDT by TN4Liberty (Sixty percent of all people understand statistics. The other half are clueless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: TN4Liberty
Is that a statement of fact or theory? If a statement of fact, what is the creature and when was it found?

There are an awful lot of transitionals to choose from; maybe the best to illustrate here is Hadrocodium.

This is when people claiming science is on there side fall down.

Still standing.

I'm not anti-science

Of course you're not...

74 posted on 07/22/2006 7:09:10 AM PDT by ToryHeartland (English Football -- no discernable planning whatsoever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson