Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

>>>The process that explains how a 250,000 pound airliner can go hurtling through the air thousands of feet above the ground at hundreds of miles per hour is know as the Theory of Flight. I guess that isn't confirmed science, either.<<<

I agree. We should quit labeling Evolution the "Theory of Evolution" since it is both unobservable and unprovable. How about the "Myth of Evolution"?


42 posted on 07/22/2006 6:35:03 AM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: PhilipFreneau
We should quit labeling Evolution the "Theory of Evolution" since it is both unobservable and unprovable. How about the "Myth of Evolution"?

How about the Myth of Physics while you're at it? Much of that is theoretical, especially in quatum mechanics and relativity. Atomic and sub-atomic particles are unobservable, how can anyone accept anything based on that as anything but a myth? What about the Myth of Meteorology since the Biblical flood shows the water cycle to be wrong? Much of geology has to be myth, how else could one accept plate techtonics? Astronomy is a myth since the Bible tells us that the sun revolves around the earth. Why with a little bit of effort you can write off just about all of science as a myth, can't you?

57 posted on 07/22/2006 6:54:10 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson