Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan

"What's interesting is the use of words like "links" and "transitional". The science of taxonomy itself contradicts Darwin's theory."

Not in any way.



216 posted on 07/22/2006 1:46:15 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman (Gas up your tanks!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]


To: CarolinaGuitarman
What's interesting is the use of words like "links" and "transitional". The science of taxonomy itself contradicts Darwin's theory." But in discrete electrronics there is the third unstable "transitional state" this could be analogized as the fossil "missing links" or "transitional forms" Rare but necessary. They're so fast you cannot see them on an oscilloscope unles you set the controls to catch them.

Not in any way.

I think so. A discrete system would use different words in describing it's dynamics.

For instance. In discrete electronics the word "transitional" and "threshold" is used to describe aspects of the system. You transition from one stable state to another stable state once you pass the specified energy level. And during the short transition time the system is unstable.

A continuous system has no "stable states" it's continuously in an untenable "state" whithin a universe of a infinite number of micro states. You use terms like "slew rate" , "dynamic range", "linearity"

The fact that we use the term "transitional" implies "transitioning between stable states" and once there we find it convenient to characterize said state. i.e. Taxonomy.

Gould and Eldredge's "punctuated equilibrium" best describes evolutionary discretness. Not Darwin's continuum.

271 posted on 07/22/2006 4:08:53 PM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("Fake but Accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson