Lessons from Evolutionist scholarship :
http://www.trueorigin.org/to_deception.asp
http://www.trueorigin.org/pepmoth1.asp
http://www.trueorigin.org/birdevoletter.asp
JUST TO MENTION 3.
One interesting quote:
Few would argue with the notion that things change. But to take the step from things change to and therefore, thats how it all got here is a leap of blind, irrational faith that would send even the most fanatical snake worshipper reeling.Believe it or not, the author is bashing evolution with this quote! Or attempting to. Sounds like it applies more to religion than science.
Anyway, if the rest of the articles are like the first, its probably just more creation "science." Nothing to see there.
Three pig-ignorant antiscience screeches from a YEC site are sufficient excuse to dismiss two large catalogs of creationist deceit and your own plagiarization of a Dembski blog entry? (Ignoring for the moment that all said entry showed was that mathematicians of Dembski's special cachet are allowed to not know what "normalize" means and make propaganda hay thereby.)
Another category of YEC argument, "untruth by edited echolalia."