HOw do you explain the discrepancy of overlaying the of taxinomic classifications with the genetic classifications?
When DNA is analyzed and plotted it doesn't support the diagrams that the evolutionists want us to take as truth.
When DNA is analyzed and plotted it doesn't support the diagrams that the evolutionists want us to take as truth.
I am not aware that there were huge discrepancies between DNA and other classifications. I am aware of small discrepancies; DNA is a better method of identifying descent than morphology, so that is not surprising.
Could you please supply a reference (and please don't bother with the creationist websites; they are doing apologetics, not science).
Oh, and evolutionists are not in the truth business. Try a church for that. Evolutionists and all other scientists deal with facts and theories, with theories being the best current explanations for facts.
Take a look at this chart, and read the caption. See anything about "truth" there?
Source: http://wwwrses.anu.edu.au/environment/eePages/eeDating/HumanEvol_info.html