[tomzz]

Chuck Darwin never said that because nobody knew about RNA/DNA at the time. If Chuck had known about DNA/RNA, being halfway honest unlike today's evos, he'd never have published the first word about evolutionism.

As one commentator puts it:

"At that moment, when the DNA/RNA system became understood, the debate between Evolutionists and Creationists should have come to a screeching halt

I.L. Cohen, Researcher and Mathematician
Member NY Academy of Sciences
Officer of the Archaeological Inst. of America
Darwin Was Wrong - A Study in Probabilities
New Research Publications, 1984, p. 4

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Chuck Darwin never said that because nobody knew about RNA/DNA at the time. If Chuck had known about DNA/RNA, being halfway honest unlike today's evos, he'd never have published the first word about evolutionism."

Sure he would have, Mr. Holden, because the DNA evidence is a huge support for evolution. And my point, Ted, is correct: Nobody says that DNA/RNA just *happened*.

[Coyoteman]

Is this the same mathematician who proved bumblebees can't fly?