Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Gumlegs; DouglasKC
Gumlegs: IOW, you took all the science out of it. Congratulations -- a few years of work like this and you may be as ignorant as the rest of those for whom the tenth century appears to be some sort of ideal.

DKC: No sir. I took out the "best guess" lines. The images author, in the bottom right legend, concurs that these are only "best guess" lines.

You need to learn what science is and how it advances.

Doug thinks that his "best guess" is better than the "best guess" of scientists who have studied the topic for years.

143 posted on 07/22/2006 9:07:35 AM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman; DouglasKC
Doug thinks that his "best guess" is better than the "best guess" of scientists who have studied the topic for years.

Doug doesn't guess. He reads his Bible and knows the answer to all questions. Of course, no two Bible interpretations are ever the same ... but amazingly they're all the only correct one. Go figure.

146 posted on 07/22/2006 9:19:57 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman
Doug thinks that his "best guess" is better than the "best guess" of scientists who have studied the topic for years.

Look, don't get upset at me. The lines in the chart you posted are, in the words of it's author, a "best guess". He didn't say "educated guess". He didn't say "scientific fact". He didn't say "conclusive proof".

He said "best guess". Which is how I pretty much how I would describe most of evolutionary theory.

149 posted on 07/22/2006 9:24:33 AM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson