Oh, this is a new one!!! So now "change" is evolution? Give it up, and just call it what it really is: The Cult of Evolution.
1:Evolution: A process in which something passes by degrees to a different stage (especially a more advanced or mature stage)
2: (biology) the sequence of events involved in the evolutionary "development" of a species or taxonomic group of organisms.
That doesn't sound like "change" to me it looks more like "higher degree of "developement" (Advances, not just "changes")
Wonderful quote mining!
You did a google search for "define:evolution" and selected the first two that came up. You should have kept reading, as the third was:
In the life sciences, evolution is a change in the traits of living organisms over generations, including the emergence of new species. Since the development of modern genetics in the 1940s, evolution has been defined more specifically as . In other fields evolution is used more generally to refer to any process of change over time.That pretty much confirms what I said, doesn't it?
By the way, no cults here. You just disagree, for religious reasons, with the results of evolution so you do everything you can to disparage that field in particular and science in general.
You should be honest and admit your disagreements are religious, not scientific, in nature.
What is this, the Clinton defense where you accuse your opponent of the wrongs you do yourself? My disagreements have everything to do with being forthright and honest. For instance, I don't call my religious beliefs FACT, where evolutionist call theirs fact when no such fact presents itself.
Evolution, a change from one species to another is just not fact. Why can't you evolutionist admit that you only have evidence that leads you to BELIEVE evolution exist?