>>>Judging the quality and gravity of your response here, you're best bet for catching up on the past 150 years (assuming your question here is sincere) is to keep it simple. Maybe Sparks Notes?<<<
Cute. But I was hoping for something a little more specific, such as fossilized or living transitional species.
Indeed? Then how should one characterise your assumed air of naivte here--you've never seen the dozens of such examples on these threads? Never before had it pointed out to you that every fossil is, to some degree, a transitional? Never heard that before, at all? Well, that is...'cute.'
Irrelevant to you, but for the sake of anyone reading the thread who has a genuine interest, here's a very basic place to start:
And a genuine discussion of the issue is here. The paragraph on 'Misconceptions' is particularly illuminating.