Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: smug
What I see is that Connecticut SC violated it's own constitution.

You may see that, the Connecticut Supreme Court saw it differently. The Connecticut legislature passed the law that defined 'public usage' in such a way to make the use of eminent domain possible. But in the end it is a state issue, not a federal one. I would rather the states decide what 'public usage' is and not have a definition imposed on them by the Supreme Court. If any good has come out of this it's the fact that a lot of states have begun tightening up on eminent domain and the definition of 'public usage'. Isn't that better than a one size fits all decision forced on the states by the federal government?

375 posted on 07/30/2006 12:16:19 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
Isn't that better than a one size fits all decision forced on the states by the federal government?

Your right on that one.

If the voters of Connecticut allowed the legislature to change the definition and didn't vote them out--
376 posted on 07/30/2006 12:33:55 PM PDT by smug (Tanstaafl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson