As opposed to the recordings of LBJ's oval office phone call commenting how Castro got JFK before JFK got Castro. Nonetheless the History Channel loves this sort of thing.
1 posted on
07/11/2006 1:07:53 AM PDT by
tlb
To: tlb
Where was Nixon the day before the Kennedy shooting?
I'd actually put Nixon pretty far down on the list of suspects.
2 posted on
07/11/2006 1:40:06 AM PDT by
PAR35
To: tlb
To: tlb
Really. Har de har har. RMN with mafia friends. ROTFLMAO. Oh, wait, I forgot about Bebe Rebozo. Yeah, right.
4 posted on
07/11/2006 2:58:22 AM PDT by
Rte66
To: tlb
"Assassination of JFK: The Case Against Richard Nixon"
There's no case against Nixon. Period.
Why doesn't this fool write a book about the arch criminal Joseph Kennedy (JFK's papa), and his long and very strong connections with the mafia, including running bootlegging with the mafia, during prohibition, and JFK stiffing mafia boss Sam Giancana, after Giancana had helped steal the presidential elections for JFK in Chicago?
5 posted on
07/11/2006 3:48:49 AM PDT by
Jameison
To: tlb
Bush did it when he was in his teens.
To: tlb
Okay, here's a pre-coffee and therefore pre-awakening of the conscience/super-ego thought:
Which threatens the nation more, the assasination of a president or the kind of attack on the legitimacy and credibility of elections carried out by the libbies?
When Kennedy was shot, LBJ became president. Yeah bad stuff happened as a result, but the fundamental soundness of the system seemed to survive. But when Democrats, unlike Nixon in 1960, question the legitimacy of two elections, 2000 and 2004, then they seem to think they are justified in doing anything whatsoever, lie, cheat, betray, to undermine Dubya and his legitimate goals.
7 posted on
07/11/2006 5:56:51 AM PDT by
Mad Dawg
(Reality is not optional.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson