[jmc813]

Its not your imagination. They DO follow the same playbook of the liberals and I believe, if backed into a corner, they would admit that they support this NAU/SSP plan and ANYTHING else Bush has decided to do since deciding to join the liberals. Their 'protesting too much' toward us is just a give away that they resent and feel threatened by any criticism of the Presidents agenda. And just like with illegal immigration, they're uncomfortable with being in the minority on this issue.

I must say that I've noticed you quite a bit lately and you have their game down pat. I've enjoyed your postings.

[Kimberly GG]

Thank you, but its only because I've become such a target. I have been a member of this forum for only a few years, but, have looked up to and respected the opinions of the same long-term members with whom I now find myself in disagreement with over certain issues. While I would welcome discussion/debate, I have been very disappointed to find that the only discussion/debate they are choosing to engage in is fear-based personal attacks against anyone, and I do mean anyone, who disagrees with Bush on anything, including the issue of illegal immigration, North American Union, securing the border, etc., and in my case, supporting of Tom Tancredo.

I stay and continue to be harassed, called names, and tattled on because I know that 'this too shall pass', as it did when I supported Bush through the Dubai deal. If I'm not banned for disagreeing, when all is said and done, if it ever is, I'll have to reassess what FR becomes and decide then whether or not I wish to continue to participate. In the meantime, I am also learning alot from the American for Legal Immigration website, www.alipac.us.