It also presumes that Patsy could wildly wield some sort of club, miss her husband and crush her daughter's skull in a fit of fury and then later be rational enough to conspire with the man she just caught molesting her daughter so as to plan a cover-up. That's a pretty wild swing from out-of-control mom to calculating co-conspirator in a very short time. I'm not sure I can buy that.
We need a flow chart here, and the first branch would be any evidence of 'staging' of the body, crime scene, inconsistant statements, etc. Once its established that there was a staging, IE changing of pajamas, washing of the red turtleneck (still wet in the sink?) - then it falls into the catagory of inside, as opposed to an intruder. Why would her PJs be changed and washed, when they were first described as red turtleneck pajamas, then turned out to be blue and white? Why would an outside intruder have handwriting that matches the ransome note on the family photo album? Why was BR claimed to have been asleep, when there is evidence he was present during the 911 call?
Here's audio of the call, and some discussion of the audio:
http://www.forumsforjustice.org/forums/showthread.php?s=4456641777d7cd89492b4aec94f922dc&t=3744