There was no blood loss from the " head wound." Hit with a blunted object that fractured the skull horribly, see autopsy report, but did not lacerate the scalp. Coroner was unaware of the fracture until he removed the skull cap during autopsy.Under the heading REMAINDER OF EXTERNAL EXAMINATION it states clearly " No scalp trauma is identified." She was strangled first and hit in the head last. Autopsy protocol is quite clear on this.
You're envy/hatred of the Ramseys is very apparent and it is clouding your judgement. IMO.
Colonel Mustard and Professor Plum were involved, that's all I'm at liberty to say.
"You're envy/hatred of the Ramseys is very apparent and it is clouding your judgement. IMO."
I don't hate or envy anyone, but your quickness to smear anyone who believes this could be a covered up accident by the Ramsey family is bizarre. Its a very disturbing and sad story, and drawing conclusions based on the weirdness of the evidence is not class envy - as you want seem to want it to be.
You are wrong. I neither envy (who would?) nor hate (don't even know them--my detached perspective is simply that: my personal point of view) the Ramseys.
I think it is pretty amazing that you draw your conclusions on the few comments I have posted...