WRAL's version
http://www.wral.com/news/9417203/detail.html
This is the first look we're getting of the new documents handed over to the defense. Holy smokes!! I love Cheshire!! Now we're up to four strippers and five rapists. Gosslee says that she looks for inconsistencies. Wonder if this will meet her definition....
And look at that! WRAL is showing the team pictures of the three boys. Far more flattering that those mug shots. The tide has definitely turned.
I wonder what Wendy Murphy will make of this...?
That version is rather sparse, don't you think?
Some things that are in the discovery or likely in the discovery that I am interested in:
1. The details of the photo arrays. How many there were. Did she pick anyone out in the earlier ones. Did she fail to pick out anyone in earlier ones when she knew their were fillers. [She probably does not trust the cops and did not believe them when they said there were no fillers and waited to ID until study the team photos.] The chronology of these photo arrays.
2. What law enforcement officer was with her when she recanted. Did they say ok back to rehab then which prompted her recantation of her recantation?
3. What injuries she had at UNC hospital the next day that she did not have that night at Duke.
4. The chronology of her claims. When did she say 3. Was it her first claim of rape or her 10th statement?
5. The chronology of her claims about Pittman [aka Roberts.] What crimes she accused her of. Where this maybe we deposited the money statement came from, did Pittman tell her they had deposited her money so she would not know it was stolen?
6. Are there other clearly false statements like 4 dancers with names?
Four dancers,; Precious, Nikki, Angel and Tammy???
Five rapists???
Linwood may want his sister to write a letter. /sarc.