[hedgetrimmer]

Such a careful reader would have noticed I was responding to Mikefromohio not you or any comment you made. Therefore you should direct your rant to him, as he is the one who is calling it a conspiracy.

The President, in his GRAND CONSPIRACY , will tell them to stand down.

23 posted on 06/19/2006 8:00:17 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq - Foreman of the NAU)

It will tell that this is just another crazy conspiracy theory that doesn't make any sense whatsoever.

45 posted on 06/19/2006 8:18:01 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq - Foreman of the NAU)

Don't poke too many holes in the conspiracy theory. It might stop the fun :)

65 posted on 06/19/2006 8:25:12 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq - Foreman of the NAU)

[MikefromOhio]

Oh I see what it is...

It's MY fault!

LOL!!

hedge that was REALLY weak.

[1rudeboy]

The smallest number of individuals/entities required for a conspiracy = 2.
The largest number of individuals/entities required for a conspiracy = infinity.

My point was that your comment was completely non-sensical, despite the fact that you set-off "conspiracy" between apostrophes, or the fact that the word was used by others elsewhere. I'm sure everyone knew what you meant, regardless.