Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mad-Margaret
Her point was that even WITH the evidence the jury would convict.

In fairness she was answering Hannity's question of whether there was anyway Nifong could get a conviction on this evidence. She correctly said that only if there was jury nullification.
641 posted on 06/09/2006 2:02:04 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 633 | View Replies ]


To: JLS

Yes, that's what she was answering. And I loved her answer. She said what many of us have dared to think, but not say, for fear of being called "rascists".


644 posted on 06/09/2006 2:05:31 PM PDT by Mad-Margaret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 641 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson