The interesting thing about that exchange is that Tucker pressed her to present ANY case, and all she could do was rail about defense spin and how witnesses like Kim could be discredited. But she never actually presented a case, other than to assume that the defendants have hte burden to prove their innocence. The reason she never was able to respond to that (other than shrieking) is that THERE IS NO CASE.
This whole case is a disgusting lie, and a writ of habeas corpus may be in order.
And Brodhead climbed into bed with these people instead of giving his own studnets the benefit of the doubt.
Don't know if you saw the earlier link from CNN, but I'd think this would be giving Nifong cold chills:
In court documents filed Thursday, attorney Kirk Osborn said that Durham, North Carolina, police "intentionally, deliberately and/or recklessly omitted" information from a probable cause affidavit -- information Osborn says would have persuaded the judge not to file felony charges against three of the players.
--http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/06/08/duke.lacrosse/index.html?section=cnn_latest
That's some serious talk.