The Terri-bots would rather leave the amount of the contribution vague, thereby allowing them to imply that Felos "bought" Judge Greer -- without ever actually accusing him of that. It's a conspiracy, don't you know.
What possible good does it do to say that Felos contributed $250. to Greer's campaign? Who's going to think that piddly amount means anything?
You're welcome.
What possible good does it do to say that Felos contributed $250. to Greer's campaign? Who's going to think that piddly amount means anything?
I think the real question is: what possible good does it do (for anyone, regardless of their cause) to engage in such false statements and hyperbole, especially about such a completely meaningless statistic?
Let's see if you can be less vague. How much did Greer get in 1998 and how much did he get in 2004?