I already did. He's not qualified and he never physically examined Terri.
"There will be more affidavits from medical professionals."
Hopefully, at least one of them is A) a medical doctor and B) has actually examined her. Don't bother linking me to any affidavit where the individual doesn't meet both those criteria.
A PhD in neuropsychology is superbly qualified. That's not even debatable.
And, yes, actually he did physically examine Terri. Much medical examination, including internal, is done on camera. Have you ever had a colonoscopy and seen the results on TV? It ain't the doc in there examining.
>> Hopefully, at least one of them is A) a medical doctor and B) has actually examined her.
Many doctors examined her. They examined medical records as well as videographic material made available at an evidentiary hearing. This is a legitimate and medically ethical investigative method. Were it not, none could have submitted an affidavit without professional censure.
Remember who else looked at videos and made medical judgments from them? George Greer. Now there was a guy practicing medicine without a license, yet you held that up as the gospel truth. You can hardly complain about physicians and other medical specialists doing so with far more material and far better training.
I know, only the death doctors opinions count, and I know you got yourself covered when you call the other two that disagreed quacks. What's new? I still say you bear a striking resemblance to Judge Greer.