Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: T'wit
You just throw a whole bunch against the wall to see what sticks, don't you? You never answer my questions or even stay on topic. You change the topic to something else when you get stuck in a corner.

You character assasinate everyone involved. The Judge is blind and corrupt. There's no due process. Michael is a murderer. Cranford lies.

Now, in this post, Felos is a "death lawyer".

The facts of this case bother you, admit it. They go against all your evil gossip. I've pointed out your lies -- Michael never testified, or told Keith Olbermann, or told Larry King it was his idea. Three lies of yours right there that you've never addressed. You change topics, attacking someone else.

Also contribute the legal maximum to death judge's political campaign.

And I know you know exactly how much that "legal maximum" was. But you're embarrassed to say it aren't you? You'd rather leave it vague -- leave people guessing. It's so small, it's STUPID to say or imply anyone would possibly be influenced by such a sum.

Tell us how much Felos contributed.

323 posted on 06/09/2006 11:39:46 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen; admin
>> You just throw a whole bunch against the wall to see what sticks, don't you?

Take two martinis and call us in the morning.

328 posted on 06/09/2006 2:48:23 PM PDT by T'wit (Due process: Two lawyers obfuscating the truth to the satisfaction of a bureaucrat in black robes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen; T'wit
T'wit: Also contribute the legal maximum to death judge's political campaign.

Robert Paulsen: And I know you know exactly how much that "legal maximum" was. But you're embarrassed to say it aren't you? You'd rather leave it vague -- leave people guessing. It's so small, it's STUPID to say or imply anyone would possibly be influenced by such a sum.

Tell us how much Felos contributed.

I have some doubts that you will actually get an answer to that question; however, if it is an honest answer, then it will also include acknowledgment that George Felos' campaign contribution to Judge Greer's 2004 reelection campaign was not the "legal maximum" that T'wit stated.

On 5/7/04, George Felos made a $250 contribution to Judge Greer's 2004 reelection campaign. This was .15%--that's one and one-half TENTH of one percent--of the total of $161,067.36 in cash contributions to Judge Greer's reelection campaign (additional "in kind" contributions were also received by the campaign).

The "legal maximum" contribution in Florida to the campaign is/was $500. While George Felos didn't make that level of contribution, 171 (23.1%) of the 739 persons making contributions to Judge Greer's 2004 reelection campaign did.

Summary:
--the "legal maximum" contribution was $500
--George Felos' contribution was $250

331 posted on 06/09/2006 3:07:24 PM PDT by zerelda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson