[S0122017]

Who writes this junk? So now "they" are sure that the species' ancient "testosterone-fuelled young men" scribble aimlessly, but modern art is meaningful? I am ashamed that this garbage passes for science. Testosterone is here for a good reason, as inconvenient as that fact may be to the know-it-all dweebs who write this stuff in their lofty cubicles. Now I must go out and kill something before I get upset.

If everyone would read the article carfefull instead of scanning the article or reading the title, you would find that the article is skeptic to the notion of caveart made by adolescents.

[PoorMuttly]

"the article is skeptic to the notion of caveart made by adolescents."

Great!

I had suspected this, and it is good to hear. So, my comment stands, and you have directed it to thems what to it should go.

How come Lazmataz can post without reading the article better than moi? More mysteries of the universe for my little brain to ponder.

I need a nap now.