Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Locomotive Breath

I don't think the SBI would've missed a vaginal swab containing semen, which is what the defense described at their presser after the second results came in.

I think the SBI report given to the defense on April 10 omitted the semen results, because no player was found to be the donor. The lab or perhaps Nifong made a decision that the players had no right to know about findings other than their own.


86 posted on 05/25/2006 8:53:54 AM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: GAgal

I was wondering how the SBI could miss that. So let's assume they didn't. Why, at that time, didn't Nifong go out and get Crystal to ID the three guys it could be? Why wait for the second DNA?


101 posted on 05/25/2006 9:55:35 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

To: GAgal

Correct, and that decision would have been Nifong's, not the lab's. They gave the results to Nifong. He is required by law to let those tested know if there was a match, but he may not be required to give them the complete report at that time, but later with the complete discovery package if charges are nevertheless filed, and it looks like that's just what he did.


182 posted on 05/25/2006 2:16:08 PM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson