Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mike Nifong

OK. I was thinking more of the details that OUGHT to be in the "report", as revealed by the blank forms in the SANE materialsI linked......if defense was given only 5 od 17 sections of such a document, MUCH has either been obscured or not sone at all wrt SANE exam.....one thing that interested me is the number and type of specimens taken, as represented throughout these forms.....as well as the main clearance for the exam which the accuser agrees to specimens as part pf the clearance.....here's the link again, start on page 203 if this interests you...

http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps9890/lps9890/www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ovc/publications/infores/sane/saneguide.pdf


678 posted on 05/27/2006 9:47:52 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 673 | View Replies ]


To: Vn_survivor_67-68

Well I downloaded you link and looked at it some. What I saw was as I expected heavily biased towards finding evidence of assault rather than acting as an examiner to find out if their is evidence of sexual assault.

What parts of it did you find interesting or germane?


679 posted on 05/27/2006 10:32:48 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson