Reading the North Carolina News and Observer story that Maggie posted, they are really something at the N&O.
The Title is "Accuser seemed OK early on, driver says"
Think about that.
The title could have been any of the following:
Dancer's driver discovered
How the dancer got to the Duke Party revealed
Dancer's Driver tells story
Dancer arrived around Midnight supporting Defense timeline
(but, they don't list the time of arrival because it must be
bad news for Durham Power)
Dancer whereabouts before party uncovered
But, the N&O FOCUSES entirely on how she wasn't intoxicated.
Even though, if you read closely, the driver DID NOT SAY whether they consumed any alcohol. I'm sure he did not say whether they did drugs or if they had anal sex either.
Only the N&O can think the news from this article is that her driver didn't say she was intoxicated earlier on.
This article is positive for the Defense, yet they cling onto one small hopeful nugget. It looks like Mike Nifong himself edited and titled this article.
"... the accuser showered behind a closed door and modeled at least two negligees for her host, he said."
Does this make any sense? She showered, (after sex?), behind a closed door before modeling SEE-THROUGH negligees.
Who wrote this crap?