Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Vn_survivor_67-68
This quote is from the Herald-Sun article:

The logs show that Shelton was dispatched to the Hillsborough Road Kroger supermarket -- where police first encountered the woman -- at 1:32 a.m. He left there at 1:49 a.m. The logs have no mention of Shelton's going to Duke Hospital.

According to Shelton, he decided that CGM should be taken to Durham Access because she would not speak and she could not walk. Since they didn't know her, taking her home was not an option.

They left Kroger at 1:49 for Durham Access and by 2:12 Shelton was requesting a unit stop by Charles Street to check on her kids. So in that 23 minute range, her demeanor must have changed dramatically.

618 posted on 05/27/2006 12:09:01 AM PDT by Publius22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 590 | View Replies ]


To: Publius22

You sober up pretty fast in the back of cop car. Even faster once you reach the jail.


619 posted on 05/27/2006 12:12:02 AM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 618 | View Replies ]

To: Publius22; All

A few days back I posted about the cell phone Mangum apparently had at the party. I said I thought summed up the case in a nutshell, making points like:

1. Mangum dropped it when she fell and did not get it back.

2. The police did not investigate it.

3. The DA is completely uninterested in it.

4. The defense not knowing what is on it wants it perserved. [This to me is most telling that nothing happened. If something happened they would not dare seek to get evidence from a cell phone one of the players did not have under his control.]

Well tonight I watched the first setting hearing for the first time. A link to a CourtTV file of it follows:

http://release.theplatform.com/content.select?pid=xDpiiRI2jJQ1hKhActHbd99eW-vKCJL7&UserName=Unknown

The phone came up and let me add a 5th point of how it is this case in a nutshell:

5. The judge is very concerned about the cell phone. He mentioned that it might be owned by someone else and that would raise third party AND FOURTH PARTY concerns. The judge is clearly with his FOURTH PARTY remark worried about whose number might be on that cell phone. He order the phone information not be released until it can be viewed "in camera."


620 posted on 05/27/2006 12:22:53 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 618 | View Replies ]

To: Publius22
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1639213/posts?page=10#10:

via NBC-17 in Raleigh:

"A handwritten narrative report by Sgt. J.C. Shelton that is attached to the motion says the accuser first reported being raped after officers had decided to involuntary commit her."

10 posted on 05/27/2006 3:13:09 AM EDT by zaxxon

621 posted on 05/27/2006 1:25:37 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 618 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson