The problem with any hung jury is that Nifong can decide to retry them. It's soley up to his discretion.
Look at all the crazy sh%t Nifong has done up to this point. Look at all the money he has spent based on largely exculpatory evidence.
Speaking of Nifong and crazy stuff he's donne ...
During a discussion at CourtTV today about the complaint filed by a lawyer representing one of the non-indicted players about the CrimeStoppers poster, someone posted a very interesting video link (under house picture):
http://www.nbc17.com/news/8581286/detail.html
The defense lawyer who represnts over 20 players is shown responding to the poster. He then says the DNA results (which he received the next day) will prove no rape could have occurred. He then read from the actual court document, offered as true under oath, used to convince the judge to order the team testing.
I hope one of our crack Freeper transcribers will listen and post what the DA promised. I heard "will immediately rule out innocent persons ..".
Why isn't that statement (affidavit?) available online as other court documents are? Would we know if the judge had questioned Nifong about why the "innocent" weren't ruled out immediately?