Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H

You are totally correct. There is nothing to argue with in that statement.

However, we are not sure what the description or descriptions were. A white man, 3 white men, or 4 white men - it's possible that was her description.

The answers to those questions are critical and I'm not disputing that in any way; however, some are thinking this means there is a detailed description out there - which hasn't been provided to the Defense. That may be the the case, but it could just as easily have been very generic with no detail whatsoever, like 3 white men.


446 posted on 05/26/2006 9:51:57 AM PDT by Mike Nifong (Any likeness to persons living or dead is entirely coincidental)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies ]


To: Mike Nifong

I get your point now. I'm guessing the description does not match the defendants, else Nifong would have included it. Do we know that she initially said they were white?


449 posted on 05/26/2006 10:05:14 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson