Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jezebelle
I'm not sure why you think the defense would be entitled to the full report at the time the SBI results came back ...

I don't and I guess you are right I might not have called his failure to reveal to the defense that information sandbagging the defense. But you know and I know it was sandbagging the defense because Nifong did not want out that their was DNA found on or in Mangum that match someone not Duke lacrosse players. That might have beenn enough to tip a very close elections. Should I have said sandbagging the voters? Or sandbagging the defense and voters?
432 posted on 05/26/2006 8:31:10 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies ]


To: JLS

I guess a summation would be that he used the right or at least a sensible policy or decision for the wrong reasons. He obviously doesn't care about a quality investigation, which would be the sensible policy and reason for not disclosing the full report to the defense, so his motive for not disclosing it was not honorable since he was bound and determined to indict no matter the outcome of the tests.


483 posted on 05/26/2006 12:45:12 PM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson