Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ltc8k6

I was agreeing with you right up to "thus".


428 posted on 05/26/2006 8:09:35 AM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies ]


To: GAgal

Okay, I'll rephrase. :-)

Thus, the SBI lab was unable to determine, from the vaginal swabs, whether or not the accuser had unprotected sex recently.

Doesn't sound much better for the SBI lab, does it?

Hey, I could certainly be wrong, it sure wouldn't be the first time. I just don't see any other way to read it at this point.


431 posted on 05/26/2006 8:18:47 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson