Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: GAgal

I think Cheshire would have been trumpeting the fact that Nifong knew for a long time that CGM had sex around the time of the incident, and that Nifong withheld the info from the first DNA report.


400 posted on 05/26/2006 5:18:13 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies ]


To: ltc8k6

My guess is that Cheshire does not want any statements to be lost. Timing is going to be important. I assume that we will see more vocal activity as we get closer to the next milestone set by the court. The exception would be the emergence of a "smoking gun" that could potentially blow the case out of the water.


401 posted on 05/26/2006 5:25:33 AM PDT by bjc (Check the data!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies ]

To: ltc8k6

Cheshire did make the point at their Friday night presser that the male genetic material found "on a vaginal swab" from a "single male source well known to the police" was new information not previously given to the defense.

Cheshire's comments about Nifong were unusually pointed and personal. I almost expected him to turn to the camera and say, "Mr. Nifong, I'll meet you at dawn. The choice of weapons is yours."


403 posted on 05/26/2006 5:30:25 AM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson