Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ltc8k6
No, I opt for none of your choices, as I already said.

Of course you do. My three choices are collectively exhaustive. They are the only three choices there are:

1. Nifong sandbagged the defense.

2. The defense mispoke, or lied.

3. The state lab found no DNA on the swabs.

You chose 3 whether you have figured that out or not. The problem is that if it is 3 rather than 1, then how did Nifong know to send the swabs the state lab found not DNA on to the private lab? Afterall you can not look at a swab and know DNA is there or not.

But as I said, maybe you have your reason for selecting 3. Maybe you know the NC state lab is corrupt or inefficient. I don't so I opt for Nifong having sandbagged the defense. 2.
370 posted on 05/26/2006 12:45:46 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies ]


To: JLS

I have already answered the question. Your #3 only partially matches my opinion of what happened, therefore I chose none of your options.


396 posted on 05/26/2006 5:08:44 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson