Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JLS

Well, we'll just have to disagree. I can't see any other way to interpret Cheshire's statements.


344 posted on 05/25/2006 9:42:23 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]


To: ltc8k6

You can not disagree with the basic fact that LABS DONT FIND DNA ON ANY LIVE PERSON. Labs test what is sent to them. Labs might find DNA on a dead body sent to them. Live persons are not sent to Labs for testing.

We can certainly disagree on how to read Cheshire's statement. I think he was sandbagged by Nifong. You seem to think the state lab could not find and DNA on the swabs from within the woman, but Nifong someone got a message from above to send them to a private lab?

How do you figure Nifong knew there was DNA material on those swabs? The only way he could have known was from the state lab. So we are left with either the state lab could not match the material to anyone or the state lab could identify the material but could not do the type of test the private lab could.


347 posted on 05/25/2006 9:52:50 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson