Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: GAgal

How will it look in court?

So, you admit that you knew all along that CGM had lied to the SANE? You admit that you knew all along that CGM had in fact had sex recently? You admit that you had evidence favoring the defendants and you left that out of the report? You admit that you did not inform the SANE that CGM had in fact had sex recently. Did you ask the SANE if that would change the report?

Doesn't sound good to me.

On the other hand, revealing that the SBI couldn't find DNA even though CGM had sex recently wouldn't look too good either.


254 posted on 05/25/2006 4:41:09 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies ]


To: ltc8k6

"....that the SBI couldn't find DNA even though CGM had sex recently wouldn't look too good either."

it might be as simple as SBI is only set up/certified to do RFLP and the private lab could do PCR; the latter being the process which grows or amplifies small amounts of DNA imto quantities adequate for full-scale testing.


256 posted on 05/25/2006 4:59:47 PM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

To: ltc8k6

Nifong didn't "know all along" she'd had consensual sex earlier, because I think she lied to investigators. It wasn't until the SBI results released April 10 showed no match to the players that it was obvious she lied.

I think Nifong knew days earlier from someone in the SBI lab, and that's why the line-up was arranged on April 4. With no DNA or ID, Nifong couldn't deliver his promised indictments in time for the May 2 primary.


258 posted on 05/25/2006 5:09:36 PM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson