I am also recalling that the first DNA did not produce a a match or even a sample but others here say differently. I swear I remember the defense lawyers saying that the first DNA showed she had no sex that night.
Yes, that's what the report said. No genetic material at all. No recent sex at all.
It's in the article and I remember the press conference.
There was no sign of any other DNA after the first test.
Cheshire was very specific.
That's exactly what Cheshire said. He was reading from the just released SBI report, and didn't know he wasn't seeing all the results of all the evidence collected by the SANE. He was seeing only the results of tests run on the players' samples, which showed no contact of any kind.
What he didn't know was there were other results showing the accuser had contact with persons unknown.