Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jezebelle

"The results, the lawyers said, show that investigators collected no genetic material of any kind from the woman. "There was no DNA found in or on her that would indicate that she recently had any sex," Cheshire said."

No genetic material of any kind after the first DNA tests....
None.
No recent sex.
None.
Bupkis.

Hmmmm...... so where was the boyfriend's DNA hiding?

http://www.newsobserver.com/100/story/427550.html


227 posted on 05/25/2006 3:43:50 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]


To: ltc8k6

"Investigators found no DNA under the woman's remaining fingernails, or on those taken during the search of the rental house at 610 N. Buchanan Blvd., which Duke recently bought in an attempt to quell student parties."

From the same article.

So we had conflicting DNA tests, which is one more reason why the DNA tests will be useless in court.


229 posted on 05/25/2006 3:46:15 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson