Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TommyDale

No, I think what happened is that Nifong was surprised there was not a match with any lax players and that it was someone else's semen in her. He, or the cops or investigators, then asked her whose it could be and she gave them three names - her BF and the two drivers. They all gave samples and a match was made.


173 posted on 05/25/2006 1:51:22 PM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: GAgal
I think the SBI report given to the defense on April 10 omitted the semen results, because no player was found to be the donor. The lab or perhaps Nifong made a decision that the players had no right to know about findings other than their own.

If the 46 players submitted to DNA testing do they have a legal right to know that not only were they exonerated, there was someone else involved?

I guess this is a legal question. The defense was surely surprised to know that the semen existed since I remember Cheshire claiming the AV hadn't had sex with anyone when the first DNA results came out.

177 posted on 05/25/2006 2:04:51 PM PDT by Neverforget01 (Proud enemy of the DBM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson