[Aquinasfan]

and one that makes no claim to be anything other than fictional.

In one of the first pages Brown claims that the background information in the book is accurate. In other words, he's claiming that this novel is historical fiction. It's not. So Brown is either a liar, an idiot, or a lazy researcher. Most likely he's a bit of each.

[HEY4QDEMS]

In one of the first pages Brown claims that the background information in the book is accurate. In other words, he's claiming that this novel is historical fiction. It's not. So Brown is either a liar, an idiot, or a lazy researcher. Most likely he's a bit of each.

Is there a Priory of Sion?, Yes

Is the a Dossier Secrets?, Yes

Does Opus Dei exist?, Yes

Does Dan Brown attest to the veracity of these things? No

Did Dan Brown invent these things?, No

What is he lying about??????