While the stripper does not have any possible causes of action against any of the parents, there is one possible angle upon which a cause of action could be predicated - if any of the parents signed the lease on the house, guaranteed the lease, or had any similar role in acquiring the property for rental. Of course, the exposure to liability is there, even if the probability of success on the cause of action isn't.
I would therefore suggest that the only basis she might use to pursue any parents would be based upon their role as lessors or guarantors. Even then, it's iffy.
The case has some extortionate value against Duke, since they've already shown they'll surrender faster than the French Army, but she'll get nada from the players.
I agree if a parent signed the lease she might have some cause of action against them. Duke is at risk as they deserve to be.