Why waste my time...
So just because I use SATIRE and HUMOR to make fun of people who invent things and claim it is historic fact is not a problem with me... I don't think I have a fixation with feces -- I am just using the BROWN analogy to poke fun at Brown's work - that's all.
If you want to have another opinion, that's fine.
I have thousands of posts on Freerepublic - alot on Pro-Life, some on Defense weapons, some on the military (Supporting them), etc. And I do suffer from FOOT-IN-MOUTH disease.
But only the SATIRE and HUMOR on DAN BROWN and his book and the movie has brought out talking about feces. If you can find a couple of hundred of posts that prove otherwise and do not talk about DAN BROWN and HIS BROWN WORK, then I welcome the rebuttal...
As for the literal aspect of the gospel writings, those have stood the test of time.
More interesting Science would go into the investigation of the Shroud of Turin.
For example, the Lame Stream Media only reported the negative things about research about that.
What NASA found about the Shroud is quite interesting.
The 2000 year old pollen that was only found in Palenstine 2000 years ago is interesting if the Shroud of Turin is a fake...
Seems those who like to throw stones at the church are very selective of what they believe about science and what they don't believe.
There is the fact that there is the bloods of countless martyrs who braved the Roman circus because of their beliefs.
Many things have been scientifically proven about those times. For example, the gospel writer Luke is proven to be buried in Padua, Italy.
What you call Agnostic is tradition to many.
The story of the Saint Thomas Christians is not Agnostic History, but History...
For the Roman Catholic Church or Christianity to be founded on ugly lies is ridiculous...
Such a coverup could never have withstood the test of time.
Science has proven the miracle (or miracles) that occurred in Fatima, Portugal on October 13th, 1917.
Science has proven that the cactus cloth of Juan Diego was not a painted image, but created by some form of energy in 1531.
The NASA research into the Shroud of Turin proved that the image was created by some unknown energy (two thousand years ago by other techniques of dating).
You're just piling it higher and deeper (Ph.D.)
Well, you've spent a heck of a lot of time on several threads explaining how something you have not even read is a piece of crap. You have no idea whether it's well written or not, but simply based on what others have told you, you are the reviewer extraordinaire.
If you want to have another opinion, that's fine.
Well, at least mine comes from having read his books.
But only the SATIRE and HUMOR on DAN BROWN and his book and the movie has brought out talking about feces. If you can find a couple of hundred of posts that prove otherwise and do not talk about DAN BROWN and HIS BROWN WORK, then I welcome the rebuttal...
I can easily rebut anyone claiming it is poorly written, from hundreds of reviewers who actually read books. It may contain ideas that conflict with Church history, but as I've said before, if one's faith is a house of cards, then don't read it.
As for the literal aspect of the gospel writings, those have stood the test of time.
Does that include abortion?
Seems those who like to throw stones at the church are very selective of what they believe about science and what they don't believe.
Do you know what Dan Brown believes? After all, it is the book we are discussing.
For the Roman Catholic Church or Christianity to be founded on ugly lies is ridiculous...
I won't argue that, other than to say that the first couple of hundred years of various Christian sects with many different beliefs proved a rocky and chaotic start.
Such a coverup could never have withstood the test of time.
Have you ever read an unbiased history of the popes? The mere fact that today there are hundreds of Christian religions with substantially differing views and beliefs may prove that in fact it didn't.
You're just piling it higher and deeper (Ph.D.)
Still can't stay away from those fecal analogies, huh?