I believe the warrant was ISSUED in 2003. I'm sure we'll find out that is the case. There's no way Nifong is that stupid.
It would be routine to issue that warrant when a complaint was made by the store and their survielance cameras revealed a license plate of the car the PERP left in..
I just think, we'll find the warrant is from 2003.
Probably so. The question still remains when was it activated and why wasn't it served until now if it's been active all along? There's obviously a due diligence requirement or there would be no statute tolling, so why was the warrant inactive, or in abeyance, or NOT stale-dated since it wasn't served?