Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o

While I agree with you that the burial clothes COULD have been paid for by a wealthy patron, Occam's Razor suggests that another explanation is much more likely.


16 posted on 05/03/2006 7:55:28 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: wildbill
I don't know much more about early Christian sociology than what I've read by Rodney Stark, who suggests a predominance of small artisans and tradesmen (and women.)

Historian Philip Harland note the lack of Christian memorial momuments of the type that well-to-do people often had in the first 2 centuries of the Christian era, and also has this to say:

"..There is truth in [Celsus'] observation, about a century after Paul, that attachments through workshops of wool-workers, shoe-makers, and clothing-cleaners continued as a key resource for newcomers to some Christian groups (Origen, Cels. 3.55)."

http://www.philipharland.com/articlehandbook17.html

Harland also notes the role of wealthier members of the congregation as benfactors.

17 posted on 05/03/2006 10:42:19 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Make things as simple as they can be, but not simpler. Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson