Didn't know they were doing a second test. I just heard that the DNA test produced some DNA, but it wasn't from any of the Lacrosse players.
I guess there could be two divergent theories: Either she's lying thru her teeth, and had voluntary sex with other men, or she really was raped, but not by these guys.
I think that as a prosecutor, you act on the assumption that she was raped, as she claims, until you have evidence otherwise. The DNA supports her claims, but it obviously disproves that the Lacrosse players did it. You'd think that the prosecutor would be looking for other possible perps to test. Who else was at the party?
Or maybe you are interested in testing her boy friend.