I've been following this story closeley only since the DNA results came back negative, which was last week. Before that, I didn't monitor the threads closely.
But back about three weeks ago - which would have been about the time the driveby media would have been in full roar - would we have seen a story like this in the N&O?
Have you been following the story from the beginning?
I've been following it and posting. However I am not an expert on it even though I did sleep at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
The N&O coverage has been so one-sidedly biased in favor of the accuser that their own Reader's Editor (ombudsman) has taken the editors to task twice: 1) First, in response to the paper's early softball interview with the accuser which was entirely sympathetic and didn't include any similar information about the players and 2) when the paper in the front section of its Sunday, April 2 edition, printed the team poster with pictures and names included. I wonder how long the accuser or Kim might have spent examining that poster before any IDs were made?