Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2nd Duke party dancer now questions doubts about accuser
Daily Comet & AP ^ | April 21, 2006 | ALLEN G. BREED

Posted on 04/21/2006 12:56:01 AM PDT by OakOak

Edited on 04/21/2006 2:52:00 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 1,601-1,619 next last
To: Sacajaweau

He said...you said..I said...When words are out of context, they can be twisted anyway you want

"Hey n_____ thank your granddad for my cotton shirt ?"
Explain how that can be twisted.
There were enough players there to know whether or not that was said. I just want to know if this account is true. The defense will not say.


601 posted on 04/21/2006 10:56:02 AM PDT by Jay Gould
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 585 | View Replies]

To: Law is not justice but process
In 2010, if he runs for reelection, that is.

He won't win in 2006. A white guy running against black people; he's currently an appointee and an underdog.. What a dumb@ss

602 posted on 04/21/2006 10:56:04 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

What is a ringer? Someone you don't agree with?

Your silliness is too much. Some people have jobs and goals.


603 posted on 04/21/2006 10:56:41 AM PDT by OakOak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies]

To: Jay Gould
Why would they give a total account in the press? The Pros. could use that info against them. And the accuser and witnesses for the State could fine-tune their accounts to better fit with what the players were being said.

If I was a Defense Attorney, that is exactly what I would do--leak out tiny details that show reasonable doubt (if not total innocence)and hold my major cards close to my vest. It would be foolhardy to show everything he's got before the strippers are locked into their stories.
604 posted on 04/21/2006 10:56:51 AM PDT by Shelayne (Antique Media--losing value everyday...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]

To: Warren_Piece

What worries me is what this is going to do to race relations if what we suspect is true.


605 posted on 04/21/2006 10:56:55 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 591 | View Replies]

To: OakOak

Sounds like I struck a nerve.


606 posted on 04/21/2006 10:57:22 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies]

To: All

People can go and read the moderator changes that you pointed out as NOT being factual..

They can read and see you had no reason to make petty comments - AGAIN


607 posted on 04/21/2006 10:58:25 AM PDT by OakOak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 600 | View Replies]

To: Law is not justice but process
By trying the case in the media, we winnow the jury pool down to those who are out of touch or dishonest enough to deny having an opinion when they really do.

I agree, but once indicted, I can understand a defendant with exculpatory evidence ( a solid alibi) wanting to get it out as soon as possible. These are kids and the parents must be beside themselves. Maybe the attorneys couldn't reign them in?

608 posted on 04/21/2006 10:59:05 AM PDT by Neverforget01 (Proud enemy of the drive-by-media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane
"He's retired-PITA!!!"

PITA = People for the Ingestive Treatment of Animals?
609 posted on 04/21/2006 10:59:09 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 523 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Thank you!

I'm soooo jealous! A grandson.....I NEED to be a grandma! But since none of my 3 sons are yet married....I guess that's a good thing I'm not! Selfish dang kids...lol


610 posted on 04/21/2006 10:59:13 AM PDT by Jrabbit (Kaufman County, Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 592 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Grand jury met/true-billed on April 17

Kim deal signed off on by Nifong on April 17

Did Kim testify before the grand jury, and did Nifong hold off on the sweetheart deal until she had done so?


611 posted on 04/21/2006 10:59:53 AM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 581 | View Replies]

To: Jay Gould
I still want to know why the defense will not directly answer the question of whether or not racial slurs were used

Perhaps, the attorneys for Finnerty and Seligmann do not know specifically whether racial slurs were used or, if so, what racial slurs were used because their clients were not present when any slurs were made.

612 posted on 04/21/2006 10:59:54 AM PDT by writmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
Catherine Crier and her ilk probably wouldn't see anything wrong even if they were to see with their own eyes Kim setting small furry animals on fire. The way Crier and Co. have been acting--really reminds me of how the feminists twisted themselves into knots defending Clinton.

In my younger (teen) days I fancied myself a feminist; now, no way! It's exactly this kind of twist-onself-into-knots hypocrisy that has lost me.

613 posted on 04/21/2006 11:00:16 AM PDT by gop_gene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: GAgal

Good questions.


614 posted on 04/21/2006 11:00:40 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 611 | View Replies]

To: Warren_Piece

"And that's an attack on 250 million American citizens."

and their Constitution.


615 posted on 04/21/2006 11:00:53 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 537 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

What yesterday or the day before I was here to use FreeRepublic to get a story out PRO-LAX players.

Today,, I'm here to make this all about me.

I'm going to do some work - produce. Don't take my absence as not responding to you for any reason.

I have work to do.


616 posted on 04/21/2006 11:00:56 AM PDT by OakOak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 606 | View Replies]

To: OakOak

Excuse me---

You are so new around here. You have absolutely NO ground to stand on!!

You're actually on very thin ice. You've been asked repeatedly to provide links for your supposed inside information.

You need to make sure the info you provide is true. We are not a gossip site.....

Howlin does not want to be in charge of everything, she just wants facts-not gossip-not innuendo. Get over it!


617 posted on 04/21/2006 11:01:09 AM PDT by sissyjane (Don't be stuck on stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 583 | View Replies]

To: Jay Gould

If the DA/MSM hadn't leaked out that ALLEGED comment, you'd not be following this case, I suspect.


618 posted on 04/21/2006 11:01:56 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 601 | View Replies]

To: Jay Gould

Maybe the neighbors roomie said it? Maybe a passerby said it? Maybe it wasn't said at all? The witness is a proven liar.....why believe her about anything?


619 posted on 04/21/2006 11:02:21 AM PDT by Jrabbit (Kaufman County, Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 601 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Hey Howlin....We love you. Don't know if we would have made it to Baghdad without you keeping us awake. And then, there's "ceegar man"!! :-)


620 posted on 04/21/2006 11:02:42 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 596 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 1,601-1,619 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson