Posted on 04/21/2006 12:56:01 AM PDT by OakOak
Edited on 04/21/2006 2:52:00 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
89 is Greek to me!
nooooooooooooo....I was relying on you to explain it!!
Woe is me...
Investigate, have you looked at #89 ? Surely YOU can make heads or tails of a rap sheet. None of the rest of us can.
There's a site somewhere...link is upthread somewhere....head spinning from so many of them...LOL...BUT it gives each case and the codes for their resolutions. Does anyone remember or know of the URL for the site?
She might have called them too. The guy on dayside was dogging whether or not they talked on the phone. But I am guessing she just sent out emails to multiple firms first. Maybe she already went with another firm and that is why this email was leaked.
She was sentenced to community service and received a suspended sentence with 36 months probation in 12/01. The probation should have ended in 12/04, but what I can tell from the computer database, on 8/11/03 she violated (or was sentenced for violating) probation due to a DUI, where she tested positive for a .16 blood alcohol count. At that time probation appears to have beem modified, probably extended but I can't really tell. It also looks like she failed to appear or report in 2004- the data is a little hard to read, especially for someone from out of state.
Because before they did, nobody knew who they were. Now we all do. They haven't done business with her. Nor will they. Clients pay PR firms to handle them, does this woman look like she has the means to pay anybody? Is she going to cash in on the talk shows? Unlikely now that she is being completely exposed. She should have kept her mouth shut and looked for a literary agent. She could have had someone ghost write a quicky book that would have made her some money.
Oh my! Have you contacted Social Services, or the elder abuse dept of the local LE? Don't know of any online services offhand, but someone here should.
Good luck getting rid of that scumbucket!!
I feel the same way often.
The key part of your phrase is "based on what we know"
None of the players (including the photo taker ) will give a an account of exactly what took place that night.
The defense is releasing tidbits of info designed to create reasonable doubt, instead of just telling us "What the f--- happened" according their clients. This is fishy.
I still want to know why the defense will not directly answer the question of whether or not racial slurs were used
Maybe the PR firm recognized she was a PR nightmare and couldn't pay them a dime.
Well, thank you for trying. It all looks like gibberish to me. Lots of offenses named...domestic violence, enhanced firearm, embezzlement, sex offender...but do they all pertain to her? If so, for the life of me, I don't understand why she's not in jail.
NiFong cut her a deal. Gives me the feeling that there's someone/something in the background that we don't know about. She's related to "somebody" with some pull....or has something on the DA and all his buddies.
The things I am learning...
Unlike prosecution witnesses, the defense has never waivered on the one important fact--NO sexual assault took place that night. It's up to the prosecution to prove otherwise.
I think they were ticked because she didn't reply to their return e-mail.
There is still hope for her, though. Gloria Allred was pimping her services on Greta last night. Probably would rather have the AV as a client, but will settle for the 2nd best, I'm sure.
If the defense goes to a judge and gets an order to compel discovery, he could be held in contempt for not providing it in a timely manner. The prosecutor can only drag his feet as long as the judge tolerates it.
It is April 21 and generally 10 days are required for notice of a hearing. Given April 29 and 30 are on a weekend, he could come close to running out the clock.
"NiFong cut her a deal. Gives me the feeling that there's someone/something in the background that we don't know about. She's related to "somebody" with some pull....or has something on the DA and all his buddies."
I doubt that. Much more likely that she's an informant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.