I think the players morals are probably higher than the alleged victim. And I have heard quite a few "experts" state that the absence of DNA doesn't necessarily mean nothing happened. But that's what discovery is for.
I'm shocked that there seems to be a train of thought that the guys get what they deserve because they DRANK?
and i have heard quite a few experts, including Judge Napolitano on Fox, state that the lack of DNA evidence was indeed extremely damaging to the prosecutions case. so you choose to believe the stripper despite the inconsistencies and improbabilities. fine.